Search This Blog

Translate

Friday, December 13, 2013

All the ways each country must bend over and bow down to the UN, once they sign the UN Arms Trade Treaty.

“On 2 April 2013, the General Assembly adopted the landmark Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), regulating the international trade in conventional arms, from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships.

1. Establish and maintain a national control system of exports of ammunition fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms listed.

2. Establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of parts and components … Articles 3 and 4

3. Establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list, Article 5 .2 This should be applied to the broadest range of conventional arms. Article 5 .3
While no items are listed, could it be applied to private ownership? Why not include bows and arrows, sling shots, and BB guns?

4. Each State Party, pursuant to its national laws, shall provide its national control list to the Secretariat, which shall make it available to other States Parties. Article 5 .4 Yep, your name and information will be available to other countries!!

5. Have an effective and transparent national control system regulating the transfer of conventional arms. Article 5 .5 A national gun czar!

6. Shall designate one or more national points of contact to exchange information on matters related to the implementation of this Treaty. Article 5 .6 An international tattlers network!!!

7. A State Party shall not authorize any transfer of conventional arms, …. if the transfer would violate its obligations under measures adopted by the United Nations Security Council Article 6 .1 You can't do anything unless it follows U.N. laws! So, they now control all gun shipments in the world!

8. Article 7 covers Export and Export Assessment. In effect, the government and the U.N., in accordance with U.N., law, now regulate all export of guns and ammunition!!! U.S. law is no longer the supreme law in this matter!!

9. Article 9 covers shipments within the country. The government must regulate shipments through its territory in accordance with relevant international law. U.S. law is no longer the supreme law in this matter!! Let us bow to the Union!

10. Each State Party involved in the transfer of conventional arms …. shall seek to prevent the diversion of the transfer of conventional arms through its national control system, established in accordance with you guessed it – U.N. rules! Article 10.2

11. Each State Party shall submit annually to the Secretariat (U.N.) by 31 May a report for the preceding calendar year concerning authorized or actual exports and imports of conventional arms … Article 13
We (USA) are now reporting to the U.N.!!!!

12. States Parties are encouraged to facilitate international cooperation, including exchanging information on matters of mutual interest regarding the implementation and application of this Treaty Article 15.2 An international tattlers network to allow Big Brother to control you!!!

13. States Parties shall, afford one another the widest measure of assistance in investigations, prosecutions and judicial proceedings in relation to violations of national measures established pursuant to this Treaty. Article 15.5 Foreign inspectors to come and audit us??

14. … each State Party may seek assistance … Each State Party in a position to do so shall provide such assistance, upon request. Article 16.1 Looks like you have NO choice!!!

15. A voluntary trust fund shall be established by States Parties to assist requesting States Parties requiring international assistance to implement this Treaty. Each State Party is encouraged to contribute resources to the fund. Article 16.3
We get to fund other nations implementing gun control!!!

16. This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration. Article 24.1

17. Each State Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty..... Article 24.2 Does anyone seriously think that a country will really be allowed to pack up and leave the “community of brothers?”


So, there is the Short version of what we have to do if we sign this treaty. Now you know why I consider those senators mentioned yesterday, to be traitors to the United States.


Thursday, December 12, 2013

Traitors in the Senate


We came four votes away from the U.S. Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations! In a 53-46 vote (March 23, 2013), the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

 
The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads:   "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, 
would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. by mandating a national gun registry of all guns. This information was required to then be given to the U.N. as part of an inter-national gun registry for all guns and ammo worldwide. 

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power!


These are the 46 senators who voted to give your gun rights to the United Nations:
Baldwin (D-WI)         Baucus (D-MT)        Baldwin (D-WI)       Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)        Blumenthal (D-CT)  Boxer (D-CA)          Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)       Cardin (D-MD)         Carper (D-DE)        Casey (D-PA) 
Coons (D-DE)           Cowan (D-MA)         Durbin (D-IL)          Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)       Gillibrand (D-NY)     Harkin (D-IA)          Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)       Kaine (D-VA)            King (I-ME)              Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)       Levin (D-MI)             McCaskill (D-MO)   Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)        Mikulski (D-MD)      Murphy (D-CT)        Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)           Reed (D-RI)             Reid (D-NV)              Sanders (I-VT)
Rockefeller (D-WV)   Schatz (D-HI)        Schumer (D-NY)     Shaheen (D-NH) 
Stabenow (D-MI)      Udall (D-CO)            Udall (D-NM)           Warner (D-VA)   
Warren (D-MA)        Whitehouse (D-RI)   Wyden (D-OR) 


This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. 
  
 They need to lose their next election. 

Send this to EVERYONE you know!
Do everything you can to see them defeated in their next election! 

Sunday, February 3, 2013

Rules and Laws in the Land of the Free

I was talking to a friend from London who told me that there were sections of that city where police were not allowed to go!! The reason is that those neighborhoods have been declared to be under the control of a certain religion and the laws of that religion now supercede the laws of Great Britain!?! The reason they are allowed to get away with it is because they are legal immigrants. Well, they may have entered the country legally, but IMHO they are violating the law by keeping authorized police and other government agents out of their neighborhood!

WHAT???

That led to this rant about people who want to come to the United States:


No one is forced to come to this country (the United States)! Everyone has a choice to live here or some where else. It is for that reason that I state that when you came to this country, you agreed to live by the rules and laws of this country!!! I do not care where you come from, what your religion is, the way you did it in your home country, nor your feelings on “how things should be.” We set up this country the way WE wanted it, and you have no say whatsoever unless you are a citizen of the United States of America! Even then, you must convince the majority of the citizens that your way is the right way and have them repeal the constitution and set up a new government. Good luck with that, because there are many more of us than there are of you, and we will NEVER allow that to happen. Besides, you would need to compete against Emperor Obama for the privilege of destroying this country. He might even help you if you ask nicely.

There is NO such thing as a community in this country where policemen cannot enter! You cannot designate that only people of a certain religion can go into your neighborhood! Nor can you say that the law of your religion supercedes the laws of this country! If you think that way, then do not bother to come here!!! If you are here now and want to set up a zone where only people of [insert religion here] can go, then leave now! You cannot say that in this zone only the laws of [insert religion here] will be followed! If you want something like that, then buy your own country or island!

For those who are pacifists, you may want to quit reading now....

If you come to my country and declare your neighborhood to be under control of some religion and that your religious laws are mightier than U.S. law, then you had better hope that your God will protect you!!!  We will attempt a peaceful settlement where you poor, miserable, unhappy, and abused people during that time and you will be given the chance to leave our country. If you refuse to live by U.S. law, and do not leave, then we will send the police and the national guard to your neighborhood. You will be arrested, deported, and told to NEVER return!! 

For those of you smirking about the fact that you think we cannot enter your neighborhood because of some stupid barricade, then I hope you have enough gas masks for the entire population. Why? 

Because we will send in helicopters with tear gas or some other really obnoxious physical irritant, and sooner or later you will gladly leave. You will be greeted by guns and handcuffs because that is how we treat criminals and ungrateful immigrants in this country. If you survive the physical irritant attack then we could shut off your water, electricity, cable tv, garbage collection, and internet and lay seige to your neighborhood. I leave it to your imagination as to what comes next.
 

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Hamid Karzai is a hypocrite

Hamid Karzai is a hypocrite. He has repeatedly refused to pursue the Taliban and wipe them out, even after they have killed thousands of Afghanis, and now he is upset about a dozen people being killed by a U.S. soldier?

Tell Mr. Karzai to fire up his entire transportation industry, because we are out of his country!!!!!!  We will not leave a single U.S. soldier in Afghanistan after the pull-out. Let his troops who have been being "trained" for a decade protect his pompous ass, and not our troops.

Also tell him that he is going to pay for every single taxi, and truck to transport our troops out of his country!!! He is also going to pay for all of the dismantling of our bases and provide us with any and all help to get us out as soon as possible.

We want him to pay for transportation to the nearest shipping yard so that we can move everything out of his screwed up little country. IF THIS IS HOW HE IS GOING TO ACT AFTER WE SAVED HIS UNGRATEFUL BUTT, THEN DO NOT LEAVE A SINGLE PIECE OF U.S. EQUIPMENT BEHIND AND MAKE HIM PAY FOR THE SHIPPING BACK TO THE U.S.!!!!

Take all the books, the medical supplies and even the bed pans away from that stupid shit-head. If it was made in the U.S., then it is ours. If we shipped it into his country, it is ours. Strip his country of anything paid for by the U.S. taxpayers and see how long that pompous ass remains president.

On the way out, "accidentally" drive over any buildings or blow up all runways and roads we built into bases. Burn down or blow up all bases left behind.

I think the armies of the past had a good idea when they would scorch the earth and then throw salt on the farm land. Probably not a good idea this time, but make sure that there is NOT ONE usable piece of equipment brought by the U.S. military left on Afghan soil. Maybe we will leave the schools?

If the electronic equipment is not worth shipping back, then set off an EMP pulse to destroy it. And then encase it in radioactive concrete to make it impossible to salvage any materials from.

Tell him to get his ass over to american military hq so he can be assigned moving duties along with all of the fat asses running his country.

Post a sign at all bases saying that your president ordered us out of the country, so we anything we brought we are taking back to the U.S. If you Afghanis don't like it, kick out your president now, and if you ask nicely we might reconsider staying instead of stripping your country back to the stone age like we found it.

If we built the building(s) then we can either blow them up, or seal all the doors, windows, and vents and release a deadly virus or mold into the building with lots of petri dishes to feed it. If you want to use the building, then get rid of Karzai, and we will give you the anti-contagion suits and and cleaning solution to be able to enhabit the building again. Otherwise, it will be unusable for generations to come.

OR we could just make it radioactive.

Oh, by the way. All that foreign aid you were looking forward to this year. Screw you!!!

Geico is promoting stealing from and lying to your children

Geico, has a commercial that shows a father supposedly eating sushi. It appears from the voice over that "in order to save money", they have stolen and cooked their daughter's gold fish. They then lie about it to the daughter by feigning ignorance of what happened to the fish. So, now Geico is advocating breaking at least 2 of the 10 commandments just to sell their product??

What kind of example is this for children? I can hear it now: "but mom, I saw the guy on TV eat the girl's fish and then lie about it, so why are you making such a big fuss about this?"

Theft (stealing) is never the right thing to do! Lying to cover up the theft is even worse. I am not going to argue here about the right or the wrong in the case of the loaf of bread Jean Valjon stole in Les Miserable, but I am standing up against a multi-national company promoting actions forbidden by Christian, Jewish, Islamic, and many other religions. The fact that they were willing to pay to have this commercial produced and shown on TV makes me wonder how many other of the 10 commandments they are willing to break.

Friday, February 3, 2012

The Police are at fault, because YOU rioted?

Are you insane?

You and your buddies killed "dozens of" (one report said 74) people and injured 250 more when you fought with a rival soccer team, and you claim it is the fault of the police for not "controlling the situation better"?

YOU and your buddies are to blame!

Have you not matured beyond the 5 year old bully on the playground logic? How can you possibly say that a fight you started is someone else's fault?

Where is YOUR own personal responsibility?

This is just one example of why we, as a country, often still view Egypt and other countries as immature little children! If you are willing to kill someone over a soccer game, then why should we trust you to be our friend?


Now, in looking at today's headlines I see that: "Police fired tear gas at thousands of protesters who flooded Egypt's capital on Thursday night to vent rage at security forces who they blamed for negligence in allowing at least 74 people to be killed in a soccer-match riot.... Almost 400 people were wounded in the melee, reported Egypt's state news agency. The crowds of mostly young men was among the largest to gather in downtown Cairo since last year's revolution. Many carried the signature flags and shirts of Egypt's soccer hooligans, known as Ultras..."  Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203889904577198550002991014.html)


Is your entire country crazy?


I say that we should just ensure that they cannot spread this kind of stupidity to the United States, sit back, and let them kill themselves!

Friday, September 9, 2011

Why are United States National Guard troops “guarding” some other country and not our own borders?

Why are United States National Guard troops “guarding” some other country and not our own borders? We have a virtual flood of illegal immigration and drug smuggling occurring on our borders and yet we send our troops to some other country that hates our guts. Where is the logic in that? Why not spend United States taxpayer money here in this country, to help stimulate our own economy instead of some corruption riddled backwater country like Iraq or Afghanistan?

I know that by withdrawing our troops the military equipment suppliers will not like it, but hey, I don't like spending my money defending someone who hates me, so tough luck for the suppliers. If you station a soldier every half mile along the United States border that would require 24,000 troops. Every quarter mile would require 48,000 troops. These troops would be stationed 400 yards inside the United States border and be authorized to shoot anything that comes from the South. The reasoning for the standing order to shoot is that since the soldier is 400 yards inside the United States border, if someone is within a few hundred yards of the soldier, then that someone is already trespassing on United States soil. This standing order should be enough to convince even the dumbest illegal that getting shot is not worth trying to cross the U.S. Border!


If you agree with me, then call, write, and phone your local and federal representatives and tell (don't ask them) to pull all National Guard troops who are serving outside the United States back to this country. That way they could actually be guarding our country, which is what they should be doing.


Our border with Mexico is roughly 2,000 miles long. If you station a soldier every half mile along that border that would be 4,000 troops every eight hours for a total of 12,000 per day. Have them work an eight hour shift so they can go home and see their families. Since they need to rest, have another 12,000 troops (for a total of 24,000) as part of a rotation that would divide the troops into two groups (ex: A and B). Both groups would work 4 days per week on the border and then spend one day doing local town infrastructure repair and clean up. They would get two days off during the two week rotation. Each group would get two Sundays off each month, and no town related work would be done on Sundays. If you station the soldiers every quarter mile that would require 48,000 troops.


The table gives a possible rotation schedule. Neither group would get Saturday off in order to offer double protection that day. This may not be a factor (?), so it could be possible to make the overlapping day a different one each week by changing the start day of the work week by one day every two weeks. If there is no need for a double shift on the border, then the rotation in the second part of the table could be used to give town repair work 4 days per week.


B = Border T= Town Work O = Days Off


M

T

W

TH

F

SAT

SUN

M

T

W

TH

F

SAT

SUN

Group A Wk 1

O

B

B

B

T

B

O

O

B

B

B

T

B

O

Group B Wk 1

B

O

O

T

B

B

B

B

O

O

T

B

B

B

Group A Wk 2

B

O

O

T

B

B

B

B

O

O

T

B

B

B

Group B Wk 2

O

B

B

B

T

B

O

O

B

B

B

T

B

O































Group A Wk 1

O

B

T

B

T

B

O

O

B

T

B

T

B

O

Group B Wk 1

B

O

B

T

B

T

B

B

O

B

T

B

T

B

Group A Wk 2

B

O

B

T

B

T

B

B

O

B

T

B

T

B

Group B Wk 2

O

B

T

B

T

B

O

O

B

T

B

T

B

O


So, with 24,000 or 48,000 troops we could guard our own country and help border cities repair their infrastructure! The temporary lift to the local economies would be huge.